I have exciting news to share! I now have a new website, The Turning Page! This means that I'm going to be retiring this blog. But no need to be sad!
The Turning Page will be very similar to the blog I've had here on Blogger, but will (hopefully) be updated more often and include not only book reviews but also my thoughts on movies and just life in general. I would love for you to check it out, comment, and tell me what you think!
Monday, December 12
Sunday, December 11
Possession
After reading "Possession," I truly do not have a clue why I've never read the author A.S. Byatt before. This is the first novel in a long time that has left me begging for more. I don't think it would be an exaggeration to say that Byatt has reminded why I'm so in love with the written word.
Now that I've sung its praises, I should explain what "Possession" is about. The novel follows Roland Michell and Maud Bailey, two scholars of Victorian poets Randolph Henry Ash and Christabel Lamotte, who are thrown together unexpectedly when Roland discovers letters that link Ash and Lamotte. Through further investigation, Roland and Maud uncover that Ash and Lamotte were having a secret affair despite Ash being married and Lamotte having a lesbian lover. Knowing full well what a revelation of this kind would do to the world of academia, Roland and Maud set out to find as much as they can of Ash and Lamotte's letters, determined to see how their love story ended.
The beauty of this novel is that it crosses so many genres in its 555 pages. Even though Ash and Lamotte are fictitious poets, Byatt includes selections of their poetry and stories throughout "Possession." Letters and journals of various characters also pepper the book's pages. Despite "Possession" being a hefty read, it doesn't feel that way with the variety in writing style.
I couldn't put this book down until I finally found out what happened to Ash and Lamotte. Despite "A Romance" being in the novel's title, it also had all the traits of a good mystery as well. Male readers, don't be deterred! You may be happily surprised.
P.S. Some of you may be familiar with the movie version of "Possession" that was made in 2002. Although I think the novel is far superior, it's worth checking out.
Now that I've sung its praises, I should explain what "Possession" is about. The novel follows Roland Michell and Maud Bailey, two scholars of Victorian poets Randolph Henry Ash and Christabel Lamotte, who are thrown together unexpectedly when Roland discovers letters that link Ash and Lamotte. Through further investigation, Roland and Maud uncover that Ash and Lamotte were having a secret affair despite Ash being married and Lamotte having a lesbian lover. Knowing full well what a revelation of this kind would do to the world of academia, Roland and Maud set out to find as much as they can of Ash and Lamotte's letters, determined to see how their love story ended.
The beauty of this novel is that it crosses so many genres in its 555 pages. Even though Ash and Lamotte are fictitious poets, Byatt includes selections of their poetry and stories throughout "Possession." Letters and journals of various characters also pepper the book's pages. Despite "Possession" being a hefty read, it doesn't feel that way with the variety in writing style.
I couldn't put this book down until I finally found out what happened to Ash and Lamotte. Despite "A Romance" being in the novel's title, it also had all the traits of a good mystery as well. Male readers, don't be deterred! You may be happily surprised.
P.S. Some of you may be familiar with the movie version of "Possession" that was made in 2002. Although I think the novel is far superior, it's worth checking out.
Jennifer Ehle as Lamotte & Jeremy Northam as Ash |
Saturday, November 5
Major Pettigrew's Last Stand
If you've been a follower on my blog for a little while, you may have noticed I'm playing around with its layout/design. This is as far as I've gone with it for now (as you can probably tell from my lack of posts recently, I've been a little preoccupied with other things). If you have the time, let me know what you think and give me your suggestions!
Anywho, this blog is about the last book I read called "Major Pettigrew's Last Stand" by Helen Simonson. It's a comedy of manners in the vein of Austen set in the tiny village of Edgecombe St. Mary in the lovely English countryside. Major Pettigrew is retired, a widower, and lives for a good cup of tea. Mrs. Ali, the Pakistani shopkeeper in the village, is quiet, intelligent and also widowed. Despite their many differences, the two slowly find a friendship and eventually love with each other. But in as small a place as Edgecombe St. Mary, everyone knows about everyone else's business and no one is too pleased with this new love interest of the Major's. The underlying question throughout this book is whether the Major and Mrs. Ali's love can stand up to the pressure of such vast differences in culture and society.
Despite the plot being fairly predictable, this was an unconventional love story that I rather enjoyed. If you're looking for a steamy romance, this isn't it. But "Last Stand" more than makes up for it in sweetness as well as hope for those who think love has passed them by.
Anywho, this blog is about the last book I read called "Major Pettigrew's Last Stand" by Helen Simonson. It's a comedy of manners in the vein of Austen set in the tiny village of Edgecombe St. Mary in the lovely English countryside. Major Pettigrew is retired, a widower, and lives for a good cup of tea. Mrs. Ali, the Pakistani shopkeeper in the village, is quiet, intelligent and also widowed. Despite their many differences, the two slowly find a friendship and eventually love with each other. But in as small a place as Edgecombe St. Mary, everyone knows about everyone else's business and no one is too pleased with this new love interest of the Major's. The underlying question throughout this book is whether the Major and Mrs. Ali's love can stand up to the pressure of such vast differences in culture and society.
Despite the plot being fairly predictable, this was an unconventional love story that I rather enjoyed. If you're looking for a steamy romance, this isn't it. But "Last Stand" more than makes up for it in sweetness as well as hope for those who think love has passed them by.
Tuesday, August 30
"Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother"
Chances are you've heard of the last book I read, "Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother" by Amy Chua. There has been a lot of controversy surrounding this book and the Yale law professor who wrote it. Many have taken this book as a "how-to" parenting guide, which according to Chua is not how it is supposed to be read at all. She says that it is simply a memoir of her ups and downs in the realm of child-rearing and ultimately her realization that trying to be a "tiger mother" doesn't always work.
I really enjoyed this book. It was a fast read and had a lot of quite funny moments to it. Maybe it helps that I'm not a mom and can't be offended by Chua's comments about Western parenting... She made a lot of good points though about parenting today. I agree with her that up until a certain age, children shouldn't have a choice when it comes to most issues. What Mom and Dad says goes, and if you don't like it, then too bad. As my dad used to say to me and my siblings, "Life's tough." Although Chua sometimes takes it to the next level (threatening to burn your daughter's stuffed animals if she doesn't play her piano piece perfectly is taking it a little far in my opinion), her love for her daughters is apparent and I think it comes across that all she wants is what's best for them.
I'd be curious to hear what you think, especially all my parents out there. Do you agree with Chua or think she's just plain crazy?
Here's an interview with Chua where she explains her perspective a bit more:
I really enjoyed this book. It was a fast read and had a lot of quite funny moments to it. Maybe it helps that I'm not a mom and can't be offended by Chua's comments about Western parenting... She made a lot of good points though about parenting today. I agree with her that up until a certain age, children shouldn't have a choice when it comes to most issues. What Mom and Dad says goes, and if you don't like it, then too bad. As my dad used to say to me and my siblings, "Life's tough." Although Chua sometimes takes it to the next level (threatening to burn your daughter's stuffed animals if she doesn't play her piano piece perfectly is taking it a little far in my opinion), her love for her daughters is apparent and I think it comes across that all she wants is what's best for them.
I'd be curious to hear what you think, especially all my parents out there. Do you agree with Chua or think she's just plain crazy?
Here's an interview with Chua where she explains her perspective a bit more:
Monday, August 8
The Tree of Life
I am going to break the rules of my own blog and review a movie- *gasp*! But before you get too shocked, I'll tell you my reasons for doing so.
Terrence Malick's "The Tree of Life" was, for me as a writer, a wonderful study in the many different ways there are to tell a story. Malick wasn't afraid to push the boundaries with this film, which is probably the reason why it has received such mixed reviews. Just go out and ask a few people who saw it what they thought. You'll probably get a lot of different responses, ranging from "Malick's a genius" to "I didn't get it. All of a sudden there were dinosaurs on the screen- WTF??"
Everyone knows when they are learning how to write that stories are supposed to have a beginning, middle, and an end with the climax preferably coming somewhere in the later middle section. It's called basic plot development. This is not so with "The Tree of Life." If you're one of those people who needs a clear narrative and all the loose ends tied up, chances are you won't like this film.
Now, I'm married to a guy who went to school for film and I've learned many things about the technicalities of what makes a good movie from him. One of them is that voice-overs are VERY hard to pull off well. Too many directors use voice-overs to slap the viewer across the face with the far too obvious or to manufacture a response from the viewer by telling them how they should be feeling. Needless to say, I'm not a fan of either of these. That said, Malick used voice-overs quite a lot but in a way that, for the most part, I appreciated. Others may disagree though, like one of my local movie critics who called it "overdressed melodrama." It's very subjective.
I'm coming to the one aspect of the movie that I couldn't really come to terms with. The plot revolves around a father and mother with three sons in rural Texas, the father (Brad Pitt) being overpowering borderline abusive and the mother (Jessica Chastain) falling into the nurturing but silent stereotype. And it is this stereotype that bugs me. Despite the mother being portrayed as this saint-like figure who loves her children and would do anything for them, she doesn't have a spine. When her husband yells at her or her kids, she never gives a response. Who knows, she may have good reason for this, but it is never looked at in-depth. Her character is not developed in the least whereas Brad Pitt's father figure is delved into in what for this film was great detail.
With all of this said, "The Tree of Life" is a movie with spectacular cinematography and excellent acting. It is well worth seeing just to be able to experience film in a way you may never have before. Although I believe it is impossible to truly capture life on a screen, "The Tree of Life" was a valiant effort and Malick should be applauded not only for a beautiful movie but also the unconventional means he took to convey a story.
Terrence Malick's "The Tree of Life" was, for me as a writer, a wonderful study in the many different ways there are to tell a story. Malick wasn't afraid to push the boundaries with this film, which is probably the reason why it has received such mixed reviews. Just go out and ask a few people who saw it what they thought. You'll probably get a lot of different responses, ranging from "Malick's a genius" to "I didn't get it. All of a sudden there were dinosaurs on the screen- WTF??"
Everyone knows when they are learning how to write that stories are supposed to have a beginning, middle, and an end with the climax preferably coming somewhere in the later middle section. It's called basic plot development. This is not so with "The Tree of Life." If you're one of those people who needs a clear narrative and all the loose ends tied up, chances are you won't like this film.
Now, I'm married to a guy who went to school for film and I've learned many things about the technicalities of what makes a good movie from him. One of them is that voice-overs are VERY hard to pull off well. Too many directors use voice-overs to slap the viewer across the face with the far too obvious or to manufacture a response from the viewer by telling them how they should be feeling. Needless to say, I'm not a fan of either of these. That said, Malick used voice-overs quite a lot but in a way that, for the most part, I appreciated. Others may disagree though, like one of my local movie critics who called it "overdressed melodrama." It's very subjective.
Chastain & Pitt |
With all of this said, "The Tree of Life" is a movie with spectacular cinematography and excellent acting. It is well worth seeing just to be able to experience film in a way you may never have before. Although I believe it is impossible to truly capture life on a screen, "The Tree of Life" was a valiant effort and Malick should be applauded not only for a beautiful movie but also the unconventional means he took to convey a story.
Wednesday, August 3
Still Life with Woodpecker
It's hard to know where to even begin when describing the book "Still Life with Woodpecker" by Tom Robbins. It's about a princess and an outlaw who fall in love against all odds. And it's about a pack of Camel cigarettes. "Still Life" combines the philosophical, imaginative, and sociological aspects of life and rolls them all together.
Tom Robbins is quite the character and after reading an interview with him, I began to understand where he's coming from a little bit more. I loved his explanation of what he tries to do with his writing:
"What I try to do, among other things, is to mix fantasy and spirituality, sexuality, humor and poetry in combinations that have never quite been seen before in literature. And I guess when a reader finishes one of my books -- provided the reader does finish the book -- I would like for him or her to be in the state that they would be in after a Fellini film or a Grateful Dead concert. Which is to say that they've encountered the lifeforce in a large, irrepressible and unpredictable way and as a result their sense of wonder has been awakened and all of their possibilities have been expanded."
"Still Life" was a perfect summer read for me and I really enjoyed it (despite initially being confused when I started the book on where it was all going!). I would love to hear your comments on "Still Life" and for those of you who've read Robbins' work, suggestions for my next Robbins adventure!
Tom Robbins is quite the character and after reading an interview with him, I began to understand where he's coming from a little bit more. I loved his explanation of what he tries to do with his writing:
"What I try to do, among other things, is to mix fantasy and spirituality, sexuality, humor and poetry in combinations that have never quite been seen before in literature. And I guess when a reader finishes one of my books -- provided the reader does finish the book -- I would like for him or her to be in the state that they would be in after a Fellini film or a Grateful Dead concert. Which is to say that they've encountered the lifeforce in a large, irrepressible and unpredictable way and as a result their sense of wonder has been awakened and all of their possibilities have been expanded."
"Still Life" was a perfect summer read for me and I really enjoyed it (despite initially being confused when I started the book on where it was all going!). I would love to hear your comments on "Still Life" and for those of you who've read Robbins' work, suggestions for my next Robbins adventure!
Wednesday, June 8
Bachelor Girl
Listen up, ladies, 'cause this one's for you! If you're looking for a fascinating read about the history of American single women, "Bachelor Girl" would be an excellent choice. The author, Betsy Israel, who was a former columnist for Glamour as well as a contributor to the New York Times and Vogue among others, gives a concise and entertaining look at the lives of single women throughout the entire twentieth century and what exactly it means to be a "spinster" or "old maid."
There has always been a stigma attached to either of the above-mentioned terms for older women who have never wed, but do we know how this actually came to be? Israel explains this and many other related topics in her book with academic writing and footnotes while also using interviews with women from different generations to add an anecdotal spice.
The book is broken up into chapters each focusing on a different decade and what single women had to face during that time. After reading "Bachelor Girl," I began to realize how far women really have come. It's hard for us younger women to remember a time when it was not encouraged for a woman to have any career other than wife and mother, but such a time existed only about fifty years ago. Example of this (from a female advice columnist, about 1954): "Every American girl must acquire for herself a husband and a home and children... any program for life in which the home is not the center of her living, is worse than death." Whoa.
I have no problem with women wanting to get married and have kids- I'm married myself. But that is not every woman's dream and it doesn't have to be. Single women should be able to be single without harassment or questions ("So when are you finally going to tie the knot?"). I really liked how Israel ended the book: "There have been too many epitaphs for the single woman, and almost every one of them is pathetic. She is not."
Amen, sister!
There has always been a stigma attached to either of the above-mentioned terms for older women who have never wed, but do we know how this actually came to be? Israel explains this and many other related topics in her book with academic writing and footnotes while also using interviews with women from different generations to add an anecdotal spice.
The book is broken up into chapters each focusing on a different decade and what single women had to face during that time. After reading "Bachelor Girl," I began to realize how far women really have come. It's hard for us younger women to remember a time when it was not encouraged for a woman to have any career other than wife and mother, but such a time existed only about fifty years ago. Example of this (from a female advice columnist, about 1954): "Every American girl must acquire for herself a husband and a home and children... any program for life in which the home is not the center of her living, is worse than death." Whoa.
Amen, sister!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)