Terrence Malick's "The Tree of Life" was, for me as a writer, a wonderful study in the many different ways there are to tell a story. Malick wasn't afraid to push the boundaries with this film, which is probably the reason why it has received such mixed reviews. Just go out and ask a few people who saw it what they thought. You'll probably get a lot of different responses, ranging from "Malick's a genius" to "I didn't get it. All of a sudden there were dinosaurs on the screen- WTF??"
Everyone knows when they are learning how to write that stories are supposed to have a beginning, middle, and an end with the climax preferably coming somewhere in the later middle section. It's called basic plot development. This is not so with "The Tree of Life." If you're one of those people who needs a clear narrative and all the loose ends tied up, chances are you won't like this film.
Now, I'm married to a guy who went to school for film and I've learned many things about the technicalities of what makes a good movie from him. One of them is that voice-overs are VERY hard to pull off well. Too many directors use voice-overs to slap the viewer across the face with the far too obvious or to manufacture a response from the viewer by telling them how they should be feeling. Needless to say, I'm not a fan of either of these. That said, Malick used voice-overs quite a lot but in a way that, for the most part, I appreciated. Others may disagree though, like one of my local movie critics who called it "overdressed melodrama." It's very subjective.
Chastain & Pitt |
With all of this said, "The Tree of Life" is a movie with spectacular cinematography and excellent acting. It is well worth seeing just to be able to experience film in a way you may never have before. Although I believe it is impossible to truly capture life on a screen, "The Tree of Life" was a valiant effort and Malick should be applauded not only for a beautiful movie but also the unconventional means he took to convey a story.
No comments:
Post a Comment